r = Number of elements selected at a time (e.g., pairs of transactions).
Combinations: Choosing r elements from N, where order does not matter.
Example: Choosing r=2 transactions from N=5 results in possible pairs. In combinations, (A,B) is considered the same as (B,A), so duplicates are ignored.
Permutations: Choosing r elements from N, where order matters.
Example: Choosing r=2 transactions from N=5 results in possible sequences. In permutations, (A,B) is different from (B,A), so both orders are considered.
In this article, we will use a simple scenario with sample data to show how permutations and combinations, and running balances can be applied in SQL to uncover useful insights.
Financial Insights from Combinations:
- A Deposit paired with a Withdrawal (Txn7 and Txn8) highlights immediate cash-out after funding. Fraud detection teams often flag this as potential cash recycling, where funds are deposited and withdrawn quickly to disguise their origin.
- A Withdrawal paired with a Transfer (Txn8 and Txn9) suggests funds are being moved across accounts after withdrawal. This is a classic layering technique in money laundering, where money is shuffled to obscure its trail.
- A Deposit paired with another Deposit (Txn7 and Txn10) indicates repeated funding activity. Analysts use this to study liquidity behavior, customer saving patterns, and potential inflows from multiple sources.
2) Permutations: Transaction Sequences (Order Matters)
Permutations are useful when we want to study the order of transactions. In financial terms, this helps us analyze transaction flows — the exact sequence in which deposits, withdrawals, and transfers occur.
Here, in this query we consider the permutations of r=2 transactions from N, considering both directions (Txn1 → Txn2 and Txn2 → Txn1).
Financial Insights from Permutations:
- A Deposit followed by a Withdrawal (Txn7 → Txn8) shows immediate cash-out after deposit. This sequence is a strong indicator of suspicious activity, often linked to fraud or money laundering.
- A Withdrawal followed by a Deposit (Txn8 → Txn7) reflects replenishment after overdraft. This sequence provides insights into customer liquidity management and spending behavior.
- A Transfer followed by a Deposit (Txn9 → Txn10) highlights funds being moved and then topped up. Analysts interpret this as either legitimate fund management or potential layering in money laundering schemes.
Running balances are a way to track how account funds evolve over time. This is essentially a permutation analysis extended across the entire sequence of transactions.
- The account starts with a deposit of 500, then decreases to 300 after a withdrawal, and further reduces to 200 after a transfer.
- Running balances make it easy to spot accounts that are trending downward and may risk overdraft.
- Compliance teams can monitor whether balances stay above required minimums.
- Customer behavior can be analyzed more easily: steady deposits indicate saving habits, while frequent withdrawals or transfers highlight spending or fund movement patterns.
- Risk managers can use these balances to forecast liquidity needs and detect unusual depletion trends across accounts.
Examples in this article are for illustration only. Real-world financial systems involve added complexities such as multi-currency, regulatory rules, and fraud detection. Always validate queries and logic against your organization’s compliance and data governance requirements.
Thanks, TAMATAM ; Business Intelligence & Analytics Professional
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi User, Thank You for visiting My Blog. If you wish, please share your genuine Feedback or comments only related to this Blog Posts. It is my humble request that, please do not post any Spam comments or Advertising kind of comments, which will be Ignored.